Skip to content

Is Oklahoma’s Budget “Pie In The Sky”

May 13, 2015

Is Oklahoma’s Budget “Pie In The Sky”?
With sixteen days remaining in the 2015 legislative session, our representatives’ failure to negotiate a legitimate budget for Fiscal Year 2015-16 is baffling. So far, all they have even considered is to raid Oklahoma’s “Rainy Day Fund,” state agencies’ “Revolving Fund,” the state “Unclaimed Property Fund” and rework the formula for the “County Apportionment Fund.” Using these funds is extremely sloppy financial management and budgeting. Two of the four funds, “County Apportionment” (developed from motor vehicle taxes) and “Unclaimed Property” (moneys held in trust while owners are located) are fluid funds. Attempting to balance a budget with these dollars is selling a “pie in the sky” daydream. That same daydream saw Oklahoma running out of money while selling tax cuts over the last 6 years!
As reported by M. Scott Carter of Capitol Watch, “Oklahoma Representative Earl Sears (R-Bartlesville) indicated that these 4 funds would produce over half of the budget’s 611 Million Dollar projected shortfall and will definitely be used in the budgeting process.” Sears also indicated that the remainder of the shortfall would be gained by an approximate 7.25% cut in most state agency budgets.
By revamping the way counties receive funds from Oklahoma‘s $740,000,000+ “Apportionment Fund” (motor vehicle taxes) from an annual percentage to an annual fixed amount, Oklahoma’s government is “allowed” to reduce funds for repairing and replacing county roads and bridges. Instead, those dollars will now be used to balance the 2015-16 budget.
Oklahoma State Treasurer Ken Miller opposes the RAID on the “Unclaimed Property Fund” because those dollars belong to individual Oklahomans the agency is trying to locate. The money comes in and goes out continually with no set schedule of distributed amounts or when unclaimed moneys are received.
When expectations for these funds fall short, one can only imagine how much and by what percentage agency budgets will be reduced even more. Any more cuts to health and education will only deepen the social services’ inequality Oklahomans are experiencing. (40% of Oklahomans are experiencing income levels at 200% below the federal poverty level of $24,250 for a family of four/$11,770 if single.)
The current law that is instrumental in the budget crisis (scheduled to become effective November 1, 2015) was not passed by a “super majority” in the legislature. Thus, it only seems reasonable that it would not take a “super majority” to repeal it. To prevent repeal, we have been told that to do so will raise our taxes. Not the case. What that “dollar-babble” does show us is how Republican legislators have been able to shift the perspective of Oklahoma’s citizens, causing them to believe that lower taxes solve everyone’s problems and create well paying jobs. Also note the case.
Poorly contrived in part, the Constitution of Oklahoma forces state and local government agencies to function on borrowed money. When the economy is on a sound basis, people have money to spend and oil and gas production is thriving, Oklahoma‘s debts are paid and life is good. What is “wrong with that picture” is that any government operating solely on sales taxes is in for a rollercoaster ride when trying to manage a budget. If one source of income is interrupted, the budget collapses. When that occurs, the first category looked at is social services (health and education) further widening the inequality divide of our citizenry. Because of the dedication of the teachers, Education is scraping by.
The most baffling within Oklahoma’s social services is the reason(s) Republicans adamantly refuse to expand Medicaid. The Oklahoma Policy Institute’s Editorial of the Week quote by Teresa Meinders Burkett of The Tulsa World was priceless, “To some, the choice to accept Medicaid Expansion seems obvious. For those without health benefits, who are so sick they will wait hours in the emergency room for a temporary patch for a long term problem, an illness is every bit as much a personal disaster as a tornado that rips apart an uninsured home. Our state is quick to call for federal help after a tornado roars through. How is the personal disaster of a heart attack or a cancer diagnosis any different when it comes to accepting federal dollars that are available?”

Advertisements

From → Uncategorized

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: